| 15889 | FS1254.1 | 3.2.4.2Objective 2 > 3.2.4.2.2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15890 | FS1254.2 | 30.2.3 Objective 3 > 30.2.3.6 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15891 | FS1254.3 | Part Five - District Wide Matters > 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15892 | FS1254.4 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.1 Purpose | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15893 | FS1254.5 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.1 Objective 1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15894 | FS1254.6 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15895 | FS1254.7 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15896 | FS1254.8 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.3 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15897 | FS1254.9 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.4 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15898 | FS1254.10 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.5 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15899 | FS1254.11 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.6 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15900 | FS1254.12 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.7 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15901 | FS1254.13 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.8 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15902 | FS1254.14 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.9 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15903 | FS1254.15 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.1 Objective 1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15904 | FS1254.16 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15905 | FS1254.17 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15906 | FS1254.18 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15907 | FS1254.19 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15908 | FS1254.20 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.3 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15909 | FS1254.21 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15910 | FS1254.22 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.3 Objective 3 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15911 | FS1254.23 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15912 | FS1254.24 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15913 | FS1254.25 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.3 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15914 | FS1254.26 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.3 Objective 3 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15915 | FS1254.27 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.4 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15916 | FS1254.28 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.5 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15917 | FS1254.29 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.6 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15918 | FS1254.30 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.7 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15919 | FS1254.31 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.4 Objective 4 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15920 | FS1254.32 | 33.2.4 Objective 4 > 33.2.4.1 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15921 | FS1254.33 | 33.2.4 Objective 4 > 33.2.4.2 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15922 | FS1254.34 | 33.3 Other Provisions and Rules > 33.3.2 Clarification | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15923 | FS1254.35 | 33.3 Other Provisions and Rules > 33.3.3 Application of the indigenous vegetation rules | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15924 | FS1254.36 | 33.3 Other Provisions and Rules > 33.3.4 Exemptions | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15925 | FS1254.37 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15926 | FS1254.38 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.8 | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15927 | FS1254.39 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.4 Rules – Clearance of Indigenous Vegetation | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15928 | FS1254.40 | Part Five - District Wide Matters > 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity | | Oppose | That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified for Chapter 3 and Chapter 33
Amendments proposed to Policy 3.2.4.2.2 and Policy 30.2.3.6 on biodiversity off-setting create confusion for the methodology of the principle and inappropriately limit the concept and application of environmental compensation.
The proposed amendments to chapter 33 are not supported as these proposals will not seek to achieve the most effective and efficient use of resource under the RMA purpose of sustainable management. |
| 15929 | FS1254.41 | Part Seven - Maps > Map 18 - Wanaka Rural, Hawea Flat | | Support | Support in part. The submission be allowed, subject to a consistent ecological regime being applied over the remainder of the land owned by the Submitter on and adjacent to the Mt Iron ONF. Further conditions for support of this rezoning are that particular rules and restrictions within this LLR extension are included to ensure ongoing permanent management of that part of the SNA owned by the submitter, particularly including removal of wilding species and control of pest plants and animals. Such provisions should include the protection of significant ecological values and habitats, and future development restrictions. If the entire Mazey property is not able to be considered for the purposes outlined above, then the submission seeking rezoning should be disallowed. |
| 15930 | FS1254.42 | Part Seven - Maps > Map 18 - Wanaka Rural, Hawea Flat | | Support | Support in part. The submission be allowed, subject to a consistent ecological regime being applied over the remainder of the land owned by the Submitter on and adjacent to the Mt Iron ONF. Further conditions for support of this rezoning are that particular rules and restrictions within this LLR extension are included to ensure ongoing permanent management of that part of the SNA owned by the submitter, particularly including removal of wilding species and control of pest plants and animals. Such provisions should include the protection of significant ecological values and habitats, and future development restrictions. If the entire Mazey property is not able to be considered for the purposes outlined above, then the submission seeking rezoning should be disallowed. |
| 15931 | FS1254.43 | Part Four - Rural Environment > 21Rural Zone | | Support | Support in part. The submission be allowed, subject to a consistent ecological regime being applied over the remainder of the land owned by the Submitter on and adjacent to the Mt Iron ONF. Further conditions for support of this rezoning are that particular rules and restrictions within this LLR extension are included to ensure ongoing permanent management of that part of the SNA owned by the submitter, particularly including removal of wilding species and control of pest plants and animals. Such provisions should include the protection of significant ecological values and habitats, and future development restrictions. If the entire Mazey property is not able to be considered for the purposes outlined above, then the submission seeking rezoning should be disallowed. |
| 15932 | FS1254.44 | 3.2Goals, Objectives and Policies > 3.2.4Goal 4 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15933 | FS1254.45 | 3.2.4Goal 4 > 3.2.4.1Objective 1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15934 | FS1254.46 | 3.2.4.2Objective 2 > 3.2.4.2.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15935 | FS1254.47 | 3.2.4.2Objective 2 > 3.2.4.2.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15936 | FS1254.48 | 3.2.4Goal 4 > 3.2.4.2Objective 2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15937 | FS1254.49 | 3.2.4Goal 4 > 3.2.4.5Objective 5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15938 | FS1254.50 | 3.2.4.5Objective 5 > 3.2.4.5.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15939 | FS1254.51 | 3.2.4Goal 4 > 3.2.4.7Objective 7 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15940 | FS1254.52 | 3.2.4.7Objective 7 > 3.2.4.7.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15941 | FS1254.53 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.1 Purpose | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15942 | FS1254.54 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.1 Purpose | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15943 | FS1254.55 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.1 Purpose | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15944 | FS1254.56 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.1 Purpose | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15945 | FS1254.57 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.1 Objective 1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15946 | FS1254.58 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15947 | FS1254.59 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15948 | FS1254.60 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15949 | FS1254.61 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.4 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15950 | FS1254.62 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15951 | FS1254.63 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.6 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15952 | FS1254.64 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.7 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15953 | FS1254.65 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.8 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15954 | FS1254.66 | 33.2.1 Objective 1 > 33.2.1.9 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15955 | FS1254.67 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.1 Objective 1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15956 | FS1254.68 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15957 | FS1254.69 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15958 | FS1254.70 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15959 | FS1254.71 | 33.2.2 Objective 2 > 33.2.2.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15960 | FS1254.72 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15961 | FS1254.73 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.3 Objective 3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15962 | FS1254.74 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.3 Objective 3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15963 | FS1254.75 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15964 | FS1254.76 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15965 | FS1254.77 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15966 | FS1254.78 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.4 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15967 | FS1254.79 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15968 | FS1254.80 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.6 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15969 | FS1254.81 | 33.2.3 Objective 3 > 33.2.3.7 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15970 | FS1254.82 | 33.2 Objectives and Policies > 33.2.4 Objective 4 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15971 | FS1254.83 | 33.2.4 Objective 4 > 33.2.4.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15972 | FS1254.84 | 33.2.4 Objective 4 > 33.2.4.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15973 | FS1254.85 | 33.3 Other Provisions and Rules > 33.3.2 Clarification | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15974 | FS1254.86 | 33.3.3 Application of the indigenous vegetation rules > 33.3.3.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15975 | FS1254.87 | 33.3.3 Application of the indigenous vegetation rules > 33.3.3.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15976 | FS1254.88 | 33.3.3 Application of the indigenous vegetation rules > 33.3.3.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15977 | FS1254.89 | 33.3.3 Application of the indigenous vegetation rules > 33.3.3.4 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15978 | FS1254.90 | 33.4 Rules – Clearance of Indigenous Vegetation > 33.4.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15979 | FS1254.91 | 33.4 Rules – Clearance of Indigenous Vegetation > 33.4.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15980 | FS1254.92 | 33.4 Rules – Clearance of Indigenous Vegetation > 33.4.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15981 | FS1254.93 | 33.3.4 Exemptions > 33.3.4.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15982 | FS1254.94 | 33.3.4 Exemptions > 33.3.4.2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15983 | FS1254.95 | 33.3.4 Exemptions > 33.3.4.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15984 | FS1254.96 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15985 | FS1254.97 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15986 | FS1254.98 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.7 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15987 | FS1254.99 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.8 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15988 | FS1254.100 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.9 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15989 | FS1254.101 | 33.5 Rules - Standards for Permitted Activities > 33.5.10 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15990 | FS1254.102 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.6 Non-Notification of Applications | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15991 | FS1254.103 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.7 Threatened Plant List | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15992 | FS1254.104 | 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity > 33.8 Schedule of Significant Natural Areas | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15993 | FS1254.105 | Part Five - District Wide Matters > 33 Indigenous Vegetation and Biodiversity | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the provisions identified in this submission for Chapter 3 and 33.
The amendments will not provide for a sustainable management regime which anticipates a level of appropriate development within some significant indigenous vegetation (subject to appropriate controls).
Any amendments to biodiversity offsetting principles should be clarified for consistency with case law on offsetting and to enable an environmental compensation approach. |
| 15994 | FS1254.106 | 21.7.2RLC > 21.7.2.5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 15995 | FS1254.107 | 21.7.2RLC > 21.7.2.5 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 15996 | FS1254.108 | Part Two - Strategy > 3Strategic Direction | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 15997 | FS1254.109 | 21.4Rules - Activities > 21.4.6 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 15998 | FS1254.110 | 21.4Rules - Activities > 21.4.7 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 15999 | FS1254.111 | 6.3 Objectives and Policies > 6.3.2 Objective 2 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16000 | FS1254.112 | 21.4Rules - Activities > 21.4.3 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16001 | FS1254.113 | 21.5Rules - Standards > 21.5.18 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16002 | FS1254.114 | Part Two - Strategy > 6 Landscape | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16003 | FS1254.115 | 21Rural Zone > 21.7Assessment Matters (Landscapes) | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16004 | FS1254.116 | 3.2.5.1Objective 1 > 3.2.5.1.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16005 | FS1254.117 | 3.2.5.2Objective 2 > 3.2.5.2.1 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16006 | FS1254.118 | Part Two - Strategy > 6 Landscape | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16007 | FS1254.119 | Part Two - Strategy > 3Strategic Direction | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16008 | FS1254.120 | Part Four - Rural Environment | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16009 | FS1254.121 | Part Two - Strategy > 6 Landscape | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16010 | FS1254.122 | 21.4Rules - Activities > 21.4.8 | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16011 | FS1254.123 | General DP Review Comments | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16012 | FS1254.124 | Part Two - Strategy > 3Strategic Direction | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16013 | FS1254.125 | Part Two - Strategy > 6 Landscape | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
| 16014 | FS1254.126 | Part Two - Strategy > 6 Landscape | | Oppose | Oppose in part. That the submission be refused insofar as the submission seeks amendments to the: "Rural Zone. Rural Areas Zone
objectives and policies and assessment matters and rules and any provisions of the District Plan that relate to these or subdivision and/ or development of rural areas in any way"
Justification for the removal of polices relating to subdivision and development on highly visible slopes has been adequately assessed in Council's section 32 reports. Requiring the addition of these factors will not provide for an appropriate subdivision and development regime. |
