That 3.3.54 be rejected.

That a new set of provisions be inserted as follows:
For an existing lot that does have a house on it, a replacement dwelling on the lot would not trigger the requirement.
However, an infill development where more than one house replaces the existing house, then the contribution would be required for the additional dwelling(s) once the rules are in effect. 
For existing houses on the same existing lot that once subdivided into their appropriate separate lots/titles it would not trigger the requirement until any additional non-replacement housing is approved. 

That the proposed revenue source be revised to encompass the entire rating base (commercial and residential). 

It will be an ineffective way of providing affordable housing.

It is supported that Rural Zone has not been included.